Lieut. May's remarks on the whole are entitled to much consideration, but whether his opinions are applicable is another matter.
That certain rules prima facie seem applicable where entire preoccupation will exist or certain tasks are recorded. Sir R. Macdonell's views cannot be prejudged. In Cha Su di fat p.38, it was decided that Hardull's interrogatories required some explanation.
One of the grounds declared the inapplicability of penal labour principles and matters related to local courts. The deferment of matters which I found that his opinion that prison discipline had a great effect appeared prima facie to be generally applicable. The separation of lifeguard prisoners and the system rebuked by the men when the Larden worked than tread-mill or shot-drill during their work (in 1865) was noted.
It was added that the Bread Wheel and the crank were used.
Lie R. May them
the Whole
Sin R. Macdonnell's opinions faction of are entitled
to munch cen
sideration, but Whether his
ве
7
That terms V. 2356
secing to
portion of long be rules prin facie to geen Aplicabilly whereon entire preoccupation will tags exist or cer
is recorebl apded. Si R. Macdonelle
orn
vieno
awessouble cannot will be predecesour
in
Cha
requati
bi pro=
Su di fat p.38.
decided without some explanathardull's interrogatories
Which to
promised that separchia &
و
2 of the grounds declares the inapplicable &
shirt penal labour oldu. local curtes, principles & mater
ried
the deferaturant Maits which I ford that his opinion that 9 prisar disciplini
great effect appear prime ficie to besparation atten a generally applicable. The sepurge Elia Prisoners & that they system & Reborn by the mendohen the Larden worked than
treadshaught th Shot-drill duristen he werk (in 1865) they the the
It was added that the Bread Wheel
the crank
L
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.